All Writing
🤖 AI & TechnologyDeep DiveSeptember 20264 min read

I Watched ChatGPT Recommend Our Competitor 47 Times Before I Fixed Our AI Visibility

When I started tracking how often AI tools were surfacing our product versus competitors, I found something terrifying. We were invisible. Not because our product was worse, but because we built it for humans to find, not AI.

Last month I asked ChatGPT to recommend a forex analytics tool for treasury teams. It gave me three options. None of them were Finvestfx, where I literally managed the product.

I tried again with different prompts. Same story. Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, all of them recommended competitors we knew weren't as good. I ran 47 variations of the query before I finally got our product mentioned once, buried in a disclaimer.

That's when it hit me. We spent two years optimizing for Google SEO, for human buyers, for enterprise sales cycles. But we never thought about whether an AI could actually explain what we do.

The problem isn't your product, it's your content structure

At Sonic Linker, we shipped fast. Three months from zero to a working AI SaaS platform. We had good docs, a clean landing page, case studies from real users. By every traditional metric, our content was solid.

But when I started testing how LLMs described our product, they got it wrong. Not slightly wrong, completely wrong. They'd say we were a CRM. Or a generic automation tool. One model confidently told a user we didn't support API integrations when that was literally our core feature.

The issue? Our content was written for people who already understood the problem space. Humans can infer context. They read between the lines. AI tools can't, or at least they don't reliably.

I went back and looked at our homepage. Nowhere in the first 200 words did we explicitly say "Sonic Linker is an AI-powered platform that automates cross-platform content distribution." We had clever taglines. Benefit-driven copy. All the stuff that converts human visitors.

But LLMs need the boring, explicit stuff up front. They need structured data. They need clear categorization. They need you to say the obvious thing in the obvious way.

What actually works (tested across three products)

I ran an experiment across Sonic Linker, my work at Finvestfx, and content I was helping shape for other products. Here's what moved the needle:

Structured FAQs with explicit answers. Not clever marketing FAQs. Real questions with complete, standalone answers. When I added a section that literally said "What is Finvestfx? Finvestfx is a forex and treasury management SaaS platform designed for enterprises managing multi-currency exposure," our mention rate in AI responses jumped.

Comparison pages that name competitors. This felt counterintuitive, but it works. I created a page comparing our forex analytics features to two main competitors, feature by feature. Suddenly LLMs started recommending us in the same breath as those tools instead of ignoring us entirely.

Use cases with concrete examples. Not "helps finance teams save time" but "helps treasury teams at mid-market manufacturers hedge currency risk across 15+ currencies and generate audit-ready reports in under 10 minutes." The specificity matters.

Consistent terminology everywhere. We used three different phrases to describe the same core workflow across our site, docs, and blog. I standardized it. One phrase, used the same way every time. AI models started quoting us accurately within a week.

At Sonic Linker, I rewrote our four most-visited pages using this approach. No design changes. No new features. Just clearer, more structured content. Within two weeks, our product started showing up in AI-generated recommendations for our category.

This isn't about gaming the system

I'm not saying stuff your site with keywords or trick LLMs. That's short-term thinking and it'll break as models get smarter.

What I am saying is that AI tools are becoming the new search layer for a lot of buying decisions, especially in B2B. At Finvestfx, we saw 23% of our inbound demo requests in Q4 mention they "asked an AI tool for options" before reaching out. That number was 4% a year earlier.

If your product isn't showing up when someone asks ChatGPT or Perplexed or whatever comes next for a solution in your space, you're not just losing SEO traffic. You're losing the entire consideration set.

The fix isn't complicated. Go to ChatGPT right now and ask it to recommend a product like yours. If it doesn't mention you, or gets your description wrong, you have work to do. Start with your homepage. Make it boring and explicit. Add structured FAQs. Write comparison content. Use the same language everywhere.

I spent three years learning how to optimize for Google. I'm not waiting three more to figure out AI visibility. Neither should you.